There was some confusion round how Google handles pages that may be extra expensive for Google Search to crawl, render, index and serve – i.e. JavaScript pages. Google doesn’t have a financial finances per website, by way of it would spend $X of crawling finances in your website.
Sure, websites do have a crawl budget, however not by way of value, extra by way of sources. You’ll be able to test Google’s official documentation on the subject.
That being stated, Martin Splitt of Google stated on LinkedIn, “We do not maintain observe of “how costly was this web page for us?” or one thing.” He added, “You need not fear about the truth that rendering is dear, we acquired you lined.”
Martin goes on to clarify that crawling is dear and so are different elements of search. Google’s final objective is to indicate essentially the most related consequence, regardless of how costly that consequence might value. “Google Search’s objective is to offer customers with related content material for his or her queries. We’re not good at doing this for all queries on a regular basis, however let’s concentrate on JavaScript right here for a second,” he wrote.
“Google Search does plenty of issues which are difficult and costly (storage, bandwith, groups across the globe to maintain all of it operating 24/7), and so on. – JavaScript is one tiny a part of that,” he goes on to clarify.
Martin then defined that JavaScript is a part of the online and certain rising. “We all know {that a} substantial a part of the online makes use of JavaScript so as to add, take away, change content material on internet pages. We simply must render, to see all of it. It does not actually matter if a web page does or doesn’t use JavaScript, as a result of we will solely be moderately certain to see all content material as soon as it is rendered,” he wrote.
So having extra “costly” pages to crawl doesn’t imply Google will not crawl it – they are going to.
Discussion board dialogue at LinkedIn.
